Design of Two-Phase Injectors Using Analytical and Numerical Methods with Application to Hybrid Rockets

Presented at the AIAA Propulsion and Energy Forum

Overview: Designed a hybrid rocket engine’s injector, creating MATLAB and OpenFOAM CFD simulations, executed on HPC cloud clusters, achieving 3.9% error in simulating two-phase N2O mass flow. Results published in the AIAA Propulsion and Energy Forum proceedings and used as a resource in Stanford’s graduate-level Advanced Rocket Propulsion course


Abstract: Liquid injectors under certain conditions may experience cavitation, resulting in two-phase flow which complicates their design and analysis as traditional mass flow rate models are invalid. We evaluated a wide range of analytical models from the literature and concluded that they fall short of a definitive prediction of two-phase mass flow rate.

We addressed this problem by proposing a model capable of predicting mass flow rate and critical pressure with an average error of 3.9%. CFD simulation results using different numerical approaches are presented. An Euler-Euler-VOF hybrid solver predicts mass flow rate with an average error of 3.6%. A design methodology incorporating the analytical and CFD models is presented and used to design a two-phase axial injector for a N2O-Paraffin hybrid rocket engine.


Displayed is the final injector, mounted on DEFIANCE just prior to launch
Displayed is the final injector, mounted on DEFIANCE just prior to launch
Pressure drop and corresponding mass flow rate predictions of the models for a 1.5 mm, N2O injector. Experimental data from identical Waxman test case is also shown.
Pressure drop and corresponding mass flow rate predictions of the models for a 1.5 mm, N2O injector. Experimental data from identical Waxman test case is also shown.
Vapor cavity development as predicted by VOF (top), Euler-Euler (middle), and Euler-Euler-VOF (bottom) CFD methodologies. Streamlines coloured by velocity magnitude; Liquid volume fraction iso-volume for α = [0 0.6] is shown in blue.
Vapor cavity development as predicted by VOF (top), Euler-Euler (middle), and Euler-Euler-VOF (bottom) CFD methodologies. Streamlines coloured by velocity magnitude; Liquid volume fraction iso-volume for α = [0 0.6] is shown in blue.
Emerson Vargas Niño
Emerson Vargas Niño
Aerospace Engineer and Educator

Developing advanced solutions and leading multidisciplinary teams